英文摘要 |
International investment agreements (IIAs) have long been considered important in promoting foreign direct investment activities. Countries around the world thus have actively concluded considerable number of IIAs, which not only provide guarantees on the protection of investors and their investment in the host country, but also grant investors the right to resolve investment disputes with the host country through arbitration. However, the host country’s regulatory measures for the public interest are often accused of breaching its obligations under IIAs and investors subsequently seek settlement of disputes by arbitration. In this context, the IIAs concluded in recent years begin to strengthen the host country’s regulatory space for public policy objectives. Meanwhile, they also impose restrictions on the right of investors to have recourse to arbitration. Since the 1990s, Taiwan has been actively participated in concluding IIAs (including bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and free trade agreements with investment chapters). As of the end of 2019, Taiwan has concluded more than 30 IIAs. Since 2016, the Taiwanese Government launched the New Southbound Policy and concluded a new generation of IIAs with countries in Southeast Asia and South Asia. This article analyses the Bilateral Investment Agreements that Taiwan has concluded with Philippines and India respectively under the New Southbound Policy to examine the extent to which Taiwan’s modern treaty practice reflect the development of international investment law.
|