| 英文摘要 |
This article examines the legal characterization of directors’liabilities to third parties under Taiwan’s company law to review the function of the statutory stipulation, with particular attention to the evolution of judicial decisions and the comparative development of Japanese law. The focus on Japan stems from the observation of commentators that the relevant provision of Taiwan’s Company Act on directors’liabilities to third parties was transplanted from Japanese law and shall be amended in accordance with its Japanese counterpart. On this basis, some commentators argue that Taiwan should adopt the same characterization as in Japan. Notably, more than half a century ago, the Japanese Supreme Court construed the then Commercial Code provision as a“special statutory rule,”rather than as a“special tort liability provision.”This view, however, has faced constant challenges and criticisms raised by Japanese scholars, some even proposing the deletion of the provision altogether. Such debates suggest that reliance on the Japanese transplant alone is apparently insufficient to justify the argument that the same characterization shall be adopted in Taiwan. On the other hand, recent judicial decisions in Taiwan recognizing that once the tort liability of corporations for their own acts was ascertained, the necessity of holding directors personally liable to third parties appears to be less compelling in certain circumstances. This development raises the prospect that the functional role of directors’liability to third parties may be progressively applied narrowly. |