| 英文摘要 |
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the policy effects of fiscal rules differ across countries at different levels of fiscal balance. This study uses macroeconomic and public finance data from 196 countries for the period 1990–2021. Countries are classified by the implementation of fiscal regulation rules into three types:“the simultaneous implementation of budget balance rules and debt limit rules,”“the sole adoption of budget balance rules,”and“the sole adoption of debt limit rules.”By formulating three separate IVQR models, this study estimates their policy effects. There are two main findings. First, the policy effects of“the simultaneous implementation of budget balance rules and debt limit rules”and“the sole adoption of budget balance rules”on governments’fiscal balances are positive and statistically significant. Their effects, however, decline across quantiles; that is, their effects are stronger in countries with low fiscal balances than in those with high fiscal balances. By contrast,“the sole adoption of debt limit rules”shows no positive, statistically significant effect at any quantile. Second, comparing the effects of different rules,“the simultaneous implementation of budget balance rules and debt limit rules”is generally more effective than“the sole adoption of budget balance rules,”particularly at lower quantiles, namely,“the simultaneous implementation of budget balance rules and debt limit rules”is most effective in countries with low fiscal balances. In addition, when the dependent variable is the general government debt, the IV-QR results align with the foregoing findings with fiscal balance as the dependent variable. |