| 英文摘要 |
The“Witchcraft Incident”, which erupted in 91 B.C.E., was a significant political upheaval during the mid-Western Han dynasty, drawing in the Emperor, the Empress, the Crown Prince, and numerous high officials. Traditionally, historians have concentrated on the origins of the“Witchcraft Incident”, and their interpretations have varied considerably. These analyses have largely centered on three key factors: the conflict between Emperor Wu of Han and his son, Crown Prince Liu Ju; the personal animosity between Liu Ju and the envoy Jiang Chong; and the power struggle between the two imperial relatives, the Wei clique and the Li clique. Nevertheless, this article contends that historians have neglected three critical errors made by the Liu Ju during the incident, which are essential for comprehending the“Witchcraft Incident”. Consequently, this article seeks to scrutinize Liu Ju’s missteps through the lens of Han Dynasty law to elucidate why his grandson, Emperor Xuan of Han, bestowed upon him the pejorative posthumous title“Li”(to have faults and not to correct them戾). Furthermore, while some historians have characterized Liu Ju’s junior mentor, Shi De, as the“kuanhou zhangzhe”(the term used to describe the kind and generous elder) referenced in the Zizhi tongjian, this depiction is open to question. This article will reassess whether Shi De indeed embodies the qualities of a“kuanhou zhangzhe”. Lastly, although the“Witchcraft Incident”and Wang Mang’s usurpation of the Han throne may appear unconnected, the two factors that facilitated Wang Mang’s rise to power, namely“the significant influence of the imperial relatives”and“the prevailing influence of Confucian thought in Han governance”, were indeed direct consequences of the“Witchcraft Incident”. Therefore, this article will also delve into the relationship between the“Witchcraft Incident”and Wang Mang’s takeover of the Han throne. |