| 英文摘要 |
“Vocational Supplementary Education”as a crucial component of modern China’s vocational education system emerged as an educational institution of significant importance. Advocated by late Qing intellectuals, it was soon incorporated into the 1904 Education System(Guimao Xuezhi), becoming one of the hastily implemented, imported concepts. During this transformative era, intellectuals promoted practical learning and established industrial education, founding specialized academies to cultivate talent in various fields essential for securing imperial interests. With the passage of time, industrial education evolved during the Republican period, influenced by a rising emphasis on the people-centric ideology. It was rebranded as vocational education, characterized by the aspiration to“enable individuals to secure employment and achieve happiness.”This conceptual shift fostered a ripple effect, enhancing the educational system's attention to societal needs. However, the initial industrial education system under the 1904 framework, despite its comprehensive regulations, faced criticism over time. High operational costs, ineffective teaching methods, and its detachment from societal needs led to what critics derisively called“unemployment education.”In response, the founding of the Chinese Vocational Education Society in 1917 marked a turning point. This organization aimed to redefine vocational education to align with China’s realities. Entrepreneurs and educators from Shanghai, Jiangsu, and other regions collaborated to articulate this vision through the journal Education and Vocation. They sought to bridge theoretical discussions with practical application by engaging the industrial sector and organizing annual conferences to implement ideas from the journal. The 1930s became a golden era for discussions on“vocational supplementary education”in the journal. This paper leverages digital humanities techniques to provide a panoramic view of the thematic content in Education and Vocation, the authoritative publication on modern Chinese vocational education. It pieces together earlier narratives, such as accounts of vocational supplementary schools' achievements in the 1920s and the collaborations between scholars and government officials to develop vocational supplementary regulations in the 1940s. Focusing on the relatively underexplored 1930s, the study reveals how intellectuals recognized that the reach of supplementary education often surpassed that of formal schools. They integrated subjects like Chinese, English, civics, and moral training from formal education into technical curricula, fostering students’social consciousness. Ultimately, this process strengthened the interactions between industry, schools, and society, redefining and enriching the concept of“vocational supplementary education.” |