| 英文摘要 |
The Archeology of Knowledge, now seen as a work on historiography, was once a work on language sciences during its conception stage—according to its preparatory work files in the“Fonds Foucault.”The gradual publication of Foucault’s manuscripts and lecture transcripts on language and literature reveals his pursuit of a science of language. This pursuit originated from his focus on literary space and then was developed through his focus on structural linguistics and analytic philosophy in the mid-1960s. These paths finally converged into a theory of“enonces”that can shuttle across various studies on language. Foucault’s broad explorations and subsequent disengagement from acquired frameworks may account for the fact that certain terms in The Archaeology of Knowledge are sometimes unstable, inclined to remain descriptive, and differ from the ways they are employed in established theoretical frameworks. In this regard, the Semiotics dictionary compiled by A. J. Greimas and J. Courtes is uniquely useful in allowing us a glimpse into the philosophical matrix of language sciences in France at that time. We can therefore appreciate how Foucault transformed J. L. Austen’s speech act theory into what he calls“enonciation,”how he used Jacobson’s“metalanguage”as an antithesis to define literary space, etc. With such an archaeological spirit to revisit the discursive field where Foucault tried to develop his language science in the 1960s, we can perhaps capture an ontology of language flashing in his manuscripts that echoes Heidegger’s Being and Time. |