| 英文摘要 |
The privatization and deregulation of the public sector or public enterprise has been a major theme in the global political and economic transformation since the 1980s. Through such institutional or organization changes, the state has been able to bring in more flexible and efficient market forces to correct the wastage and waste of resources resulting from the state's direct investment in productive activities. For the European countries with large public enterprises, therefore, the real policy choice was no longer whether or not to privatize, but rather the limits of this policy. France, as one of the most known countries with a large public sector in Europe, has been faced with this question for many years. In the debate on privatization, the traditional concept of public service in public law has been an important consideration in the overall process of institutional change, and has even led to further debates on the role and function of the state. On 2024, Taiwan’s governmental Railway Agency has changed it’s organization to a civil company. Such a event revoked once again the discussion of public enterprise’s privatization police. In fact, it is not only an issue of enterprise’s organization, but also an issue of public service: an economic and convent way of transportation, is still a mission of government? How shall we face all the difficulties from this organization change? The jurisprudence of constitutional court has given us what kind of principle in this issue? In this paper, we explore the institutional boundaries drawn by the constitutional order in relation to privatization activities in the light of the requirements of public service, starting from the formation of the concept of 'public service' in French public law. At the same time, it introduces some basic understandings of comparative law into the discussion of related issues in Taiwan. |