| 英文摘要 |
This article from the perspective of ''institutions analysis'', analyzes the institutional content and enforcement strategies of the United States' legislation on the ''elimination of forced labor'', and then explores Taiwan's feasible response policies in the future when facing the United States' requirements to implement the ''elimination of forced labor.'' The study found that the United States has promoted legislation to ''eliminate forced labor'' for more than 130 years. The legislative institutions have changed from ''import regulation'' to ''transnational application,'' and the enforcement strategies have changed from ''investigating specific products'' to ''investigating specific products.'' The ''principle of rebuttable presumption'' and ''importer due diligence supply chain'', these new legislative institutions and enforcement strategies have not only enabled the United States to continue to improve the effectiveness of enforcement, but also ''transnational application'' legislation has caused considerable pressure on our country. In the face of pressure from the United States, it is suggested that when amending the ''Human Trafficking Prevention Act'' to prohibit the import of forced labor products, the government should adopt the legislative principle of ''expanding import regulation'' and not only use ''specific products'' as a means to eliminate forced labor. The goal of import regulation should also be to implement import regulations on ''forced labor from specific areas''. In terms of ''enforcement strategy'', it is recommended that the government refer to the practice of the US CBP, adopt the principle of ''rebuttable presumption'', and require importers to target supplies. Only by conducting due diligence on the chain can truly prevent the import of products with forced labor. |