| 英文摘要 |
Financial regulatory measures are efficient, convenient, widely applicable and highly targeted, serving as an important regulatory tool for regulatory authorities. These measures are not clearly defined in law and are essentially external management tools that emphasize both prevention and correction, and thus cannot be classified under a single type of administrative action. The system of financial regulatory measures in mainland China has problems such as ambiguous boundaries with penalties, lack of unified setting standards, insufficiently detailed application scenarios, absence of implementation procedures, restricted implementation subjects, and inadequate information disclosure. From legislative perspective, it is suggested that the Financial Law be used as the top-level design, and the measures be classified into non-mandatory regulatory measures, general regulatory compulsory measures, and prudential regulatory compulsory measures based on factors such as mandatory nature, rights reduction, and urgency. The attributes and types of regulatory measures at different levels should be clearly defined. At the same time, a special implementation method for regulatory compulsory measures should be formulated at the regulatory level to specify the specific application procedures and supervision and relief mechanisms, achieving institutional improvement at both the substantive and procedural law levels. |