| 英文摘要 |
Ask an answerable question Noise in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment has significant physical and psychological impacts on patients, with about 50% of ICU patients experiencing sleep disturbances during their stay. Among the many methods proposed to promote sleep, ''white noise''-a sound composed of different frequencies with steady characteristics-has been recognized for its ability to effectively mask environmental noise. Due to its simplicity and low cost, white noise has gained attention. However, existing evidence on the effects of white noise remains inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effectiveness of white noise in improving sleep quality among adult ICU patients through an evidence-based approach. The Method and Analysis of Literature Review A literature search was conducted in databases such as Airiti Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed. The search focused on systematic review and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with keywords including ''Intensive Care Unit adult patient'', ''white noise'', and ''sleep''. Boolean logic (OR, AND, NOT) was employed to refine the search, and duplicate articles or those unrelated to the PICO topic were excluded. Ultimately, two studies were selected for appraisal. Critical Appraisal The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI, 2020) critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate quasi-experimental and experimental studies. Evidence levels were categorized based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM, 2011). The two included studies comprised one quasi-experimental study (level III) and one RCT (level I). Results, Conclusions, and Recommendations The evidence suggests inconsistent results regarding the effectiveness of white noise in improving sleep quality among ICU patients. Nevertheless, white noise is a simple, low-cost, and non-invasive method that may help mitigate the physical and psychological impacts of ICU environmental noise. This study recommends using white noise for ICU patients whose sleep quality remains poor after trying other sleep-promoting methods. Given that only two relevant studies were identified under the set search criteria, the evidence strength is limited. Future efforts should continue to search for and critically appraise additional studies on this topic to provide more robust evidence, serving as a reference for improving sleep quality among ICU patients. |