| 英文摘要 |
The chapter“At Fifteen I Set My Mind on Learning”吾十有五而志於學, namely 2.4, in the Analects has long been discussed by related scholarship. Due to shifts in academic trends over time as well as the different backgrounds of individual scholars, however, interpretations have proven limited in explaining specific terms and clarifying the meaning of the entire text. For example,“learning”學at the beginning of the chapter may be either based on its literal meaning or profound to the extent that it is unable to be fully understood within the contexts of Confucius’s life and main ambitions. A second example is the term“mandate of heaven”天命. Previous scholars have incorporated it within notions of“mandate of fortune”祿命and“mandate of virtue”德命. Others, such as Xu Fuguan徐復觀(1904-1982) and Liu Shuxian劉述先(1934-2016), have offered a more precise definition; however, they have an ambiguous understanding of“heaven”天and“mandate”命(or“fortune”), occassionally confounding the two terms in the Analects. The present article examines the contexts of this chapter, mainly using a textual analysis of the Analects to verify itself as well as references to Confucius’s life and related unearthed materials to indicate that here“learning”is actually“rites”禮. Although Confucian rites have received wide scholarly attention, this framework has yet to be adopted in intrepretations of chapter 2.4. This article thus argues that Confucius’s learning process from the ages of“fifteen”to“seventy”is closely related to rites: at fifteen, he set his heart to learn them; at thirty, he knew their meanings and established his own theory; at forty, he observed the“righteousness”禮義embedded therein without being confused by changes; at fifty, he apprehended the“mandate of heaven”through consistently experiencing them; at sixty, he was certain about the essence of things by reflecting on them; and at seventy, he achieved the harmony of knowledge and action as both his thoughts and doings were in line with rites. This article concludes by using the self-description found in the Mencius as a comparison to prove its understanding of the literary contexts of the Analects 2.4. |