| 英文摘要 |
Basically, this is a dispute between civil litigation and administrative litigation. This dispute over trial rights only exists in countries with civil law systems. Countries with common law systems basically do not have this problem. First of all, the first dispute is: the nature of the right to apply for a patent. Some people think it is an application right under administrative procedure law and public law; others think it is an expectation right under civil law and it is a civil dispute case. Both camps have supporters in Taiwan's courts and administrative agencies. Taiwan's Patent Law stipulates that after the patent administrative action is approved, if it is found that the applicant is not the real applicant (not the real inventor), the patent can be filed with the administrative agency and the patent right can be revoked. The second dispute is: The patent law does not provide for what should be done if it is discovered that the applicant is not the real applicant before the patent administrative action is approved? Should the dispute be resolved through administrative litigation according to precedent? Or should the dispute be resolved through civil courts? In early 2023, Taiwan announced a draft amendment to the patent law that would shift the aforementioned administrative litigation to civil litigation to resolve disputes. However, the draft amendment to the patent law has not been passed. The old law is still maintained, and the deadlock has not yet been resolved. The third dispute is: the legal positioning of invented technology, which is discussed below in this article. |