英文摘要 |
The rules to harmonize the treaty interpretation are intended to avoid possible conflicts between the domestic courts’construction of statutes and the international obligations under international laws in particular treaties, or the conflicts between the domestic courts and the executive branches on the construction of statutes, which may be related to treaty interpretation. It is helpful to understand these rules and their limitations or reality with a comprehensive and objective approach with the national and international viewpoints to prevent the mechanical application. China made the rules to harmonize the treaty interpretation after entry into the World Trade Organization, but something remains puzzling. This paper argues that it must be taken, under the guidance of the thought of coordinating the domestic rule of law and the foreign related rule of law, from the combination of the national and international viewpoints to have a comprehensive and objective analysis on the rules to harmonize treaty interpretation originated from the case laws in the United States; to redefine the nature of“foreign related”cases based on the Chinese situations, and a reconsideration on Chinese courts to interpret the treaties which have been transformed or incorporated into the domestic laws for the purpose of the best application of laws. |