文化變革之歧路：《春秋董氏學》與《春秋繁露義證》的「改制」論爭

The Divergence of Culture Reformation: On the Debate over ''Gai-Zhi改制'' in Chunqiu Dongshi xue春秋董氏學and Chunqiu fanlu yizheng春秋繁露義證

本文以董仲舒「改制更化」說中蘊含的文化變革問題為基礎，比較康有為《春秋董氏學》中的「孔子改制」說與蘇輿《春秋繁露義證》中的「改制立義」說，探討二家如何在清末世變中論述「道」的同、變之理。藉此，本文回應當前學界對康、蘇論爭的解釋爭議，析論康有為及蘇輿面對世變的取徑異同，也呈顯儒家改制說的文化變革思維。

This article discusses the debate in the late Qing Dynasty between Kang Yowei康有為and Su Yu蘇輿on the theory of ''Gai-zhi改制'' which could be traced back to Dong Zhongshu董仲舒in the Western Han Dynasty and implies the issue of basis of culture reformation. By comparing Kang's and Su's explanations of the reasons that ''Dao道'' is not only unchangeable but also changeable, this article responds the current discussions about the Kang's and Su's different perspectives on the culture transformation, and also presents a Confucian way of thinking on the compromise between culture conservation and radical abolition.