英文摘要 |
This paper investigated the Dongding Oolong Tea Competition held by the Lugu Farmers’Association in Nantou County. Specifically, it explored the interplay between competition mechanisms and industrial development by examining how competition mechanisms facilitated brand creation and influenced production and consumption models. Although Dongding oolong tea has been ranked among the most expensive tea products since the 1970s, it faces market confusion due to high product homogeneity and the lack of a credible evaluation mechanism. To open up new prospects, the Lugu Farmers’Association adopted and transformed the competition mechanisms for traditional agricultural products. From 1976, the Association has organized tea competitions aiming to promote standardization requirements for Dongding oolong tea, improve the quality of tea production and enhance the development of Dongding oolong tea through the establishment of an objective evaluation system. However, contestants focused exclusively on meeting the judging criteria for favorable competition results, thus erasing their own unique flavors; while consumers relied excessively on the brands and grades for their purchases, thus limiting their choices. These highlighted the mutually reinforcing yet restricting relationship between competition mechanisms and industrial development. As the competition became increasingly fierce, the rise in technical and capital thresholds of tea production also led to a change in the contestant demographics. Professional contestants, aiming to increase their chances of winning, leveraged their capital and technology to submit more entries, while ordinary tea farmers withdrew from the competition and switched to other cash crops or careers, causing a decline in tea production in Lugu. As the Dongding oolong tea industry evolves, the feedback from the tea industry has reshaped the tea competition system. Dongding oolong tea, which originally carried the connotation related to the place of origin, now stands for a flavor standard with both fermented and roasted aromas, strict adherence to the traditional production method and prohibition of extruder use for appearance modification. However, the increasing scale and frequency of competitions may also lead to undue reliance on the authoritative guarantee of the evaluation system, which stagnates farmers and consumers’understanding of tea and may undermine the future development of Taiwan’s tea industry. |