英文摘要 |
In China's practice of pre-trial detention management, there has long existed a potential bias, which regards the rate of pre-trial detention as the main criterion for assessing management levels. Consequently, any reduction in the pre-trial detention rate, regardless of the reasons, is considered an achievement in detention management. However, the proper metrics for evaluating the level of pre-trial detention management should primarily be the number of detainees or the rate of detention population, not merely the pre-trial detention rate itself. Comparing China's pre-trial detention management with international standards using the detention population rate reveals significant room for improvement. The effective implementation of the criminal justice policy of“arresting less and detaining cautiously according to the law”is an essential path to enhancing the management level of pre-trial detention. From a holistic perspective, the opportunity presented by the fourth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law should be seized to decisively overhaul China's criminal detention system. This starts with abolishing the substantive detention regime of 37-day detentions and using this reform as a lever to solve the structurally ingrained challenges of pre-trial detention. |