影射、誤解、辯駁：辨析阮大鋮戲劇作品中的自我投射

Counterfeit, Misunderstanding, Disputing: Discriminates Ruan Dacheng in the Play Work the Self-Projection

本文主要辨析阮大鋮戲劇作品中的影射書寫。石巢四種曲為阮大鋮代表作品，而劇本創作的時間落在兩大案件時期，分別是欽定逆案與復社人士上承《留都防亂公揭》後的罷職一案。兩案對阮大鋮的仕宦之途有重大的影響。而此二時期的創作，則有阮大鋮藉戲劇進而影射事件一說，故本文希望討論下列幾個問題：首先，阮大鋮仕宦一途之轉折。崇禎六年（1633）陸續完成了《春燈謎》等四部作品，其內容以錯認、誤解串連了生角的悲慘、離奇、圓滿的遭遇。本文將以錯認、誤解的情節，辨析是否為阮大鋮內心的訴說。其二，崇禎十一年（1638）〈留都防亂公揭〉的影響。遭貶為民時所寫的石巢四種曲，內容是否真有影射東林黨、復社及寄託自身遭遇。其三，辨析其影射之說。前人研究中，影射、辯駁之說的內容為大宗，認為阮大鋮有意替己辯駁之意。本文希望打破影射、自我辯駁的框架，重新審視石巢四種，並以傳奇內容、史書記載等，作為辨析其自我影射、辯駁之說是否成立。

This article mainly discriminates Ruan Dacheng in the play work counterfeit writing. Shi chao Four kinds were Ruan Dacheng represents the work, but the play writing time falls on two documents times, two documents are a public official the way to Ruan Dacheng to have the significant influence. This article hoped discusses the following several issues. First,in 1633 has completed the chun deng mi one after another and so on four works, its content mistakenly recognized, the misunderstanding has established contacts the new actor pitifully, strange, the complete bitter experience. This article will mistakenly recognize, the misunderstanding plot, will discriminate whether for Ruan Dacheng innermost feelings relating.Second,in 1638 Ruan writes Shi chao Four kinds whether the content really does have insinuated and reposes own bitter experience. Third, discriminates saying of its counterfeit. This article hoped breaks the counterfeit, disputes the frame again carefully examines as discriminates its self-counterfeit, disputes it to say whether establishes.