英文摘要 |
While the Book of Job is a specific examination of human suffering, it defies any definitive solution and raises a battery of questions. Since relying exclusively on logical reasoning when interpreting immense suffering can result in lingering uncertainties, we attempt to adopt an alternative aesthetic approach by scrutinizing the dialogues involving Satan and God, Job and his friends, as well as Job and God, emphasizing the following four specific concerns. First, Satan’s egotistical stance contests the unwavering trust in God, but this challenge prompts an extensive reconsideration. When perceived as a metaphorical game, this challenge transcends conventional transactions and provides Job an opportunity for introspection and revitalizes the potential for meaningful dialogue. Secondly, the failure of Job’s companions to grasp the profound significance of suffering, manifested through interminable debates, inadvertently results in detrimental consequences. Initially benevolent in their intentions, these comforters turn out to be relentless debaters. Nevertheless, their verbose discourses offer divergent perspectives, generating a polyphony of voices, thereby shaping the unique aesthetics of dialogue. Thirdly, Job’s inward turn seeks deeper comprehension and genuine communication. His quest is not merely for solace or logical explanations for calamities but rather for an authentic conversation with a higher divine power—for the true communion and dialogue. Fourthly, the concluding chapters of Job epitomize the pinnacle of dialogue aesthetics through God’s revelations and the probing inquiry,“Do you know?”and firmly exemplify the constituents of dialogue: presence, positive inquisitiveness, inclusivity, and a pathway to reconciliation. In a nutshell, Job vividly presents the aesthetics of dialogue, subtly delineates the path from skepticism, human intellectuality to enlightenment, and dramatically illustrates a transformative reconciliation with both the self and the cosmic order. |