學術爭鳴與中國法理學的發展

Debates and the Development of Chinese Jurisprudence

學術爭鳴對中國法理學的發展具有特殊意義。相比於部門法學，法理學的話題相對分散，方法更加多元，立場分歧影響更大，由此帶來互動無效性和發展無序性的質疑。通過對近二十年來中國法理學發生的十場學術爭鳴的考察可以發現，法理學討論的意義首先維繫學科自身的存在價值，同時也具有聚焦核心議題、拓展法理學論域、提升方法論自覺、增進問題內省和論證深入、建構學理體系的價值。未來中國法理學的發展存在著研究論域上向部門法理學拓展，研究進路上向流派化演變，以及研究姿態上向參與者轉換的趨勢。

Academic debate has special significance to the development of Chinese jurisprudence. The orderliness of the development in jurisprudence as well as the effectiveness of legal theorists' interaction could be in doubt. After examining ten debates in Chinese jurisprudence in the last two decades, it can be found that the debates in jurisprudence are valuable because jurisprudence itself is meaningful. Besides, those debates have five other values on issues, methodology, argumentations and theoretical system construction. Three tendencies of Chinese jurisprudence development were shown as well: from general jurisprudence to special jurisprudence, from methodological blindness to consciousness, from translating foreign theory to participating in debates of worldwide jurisprudence.