月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
子衿論衡 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
徐復觀與牟宗三對孟子性善論詮釋之比較
並列篇名
A Comparison between Xu Fuguan's and Mou Zongsan's Interpretation of Mencius' Theory of Xing-Shan
作者 林柔瑀
中文摘要
本文的目的是比較徐復觀與牟宗三這兩位思想家對孟子性善論之詮釋。徐復觀與牟宗三是當代新儒家的兩位核心人物,他們都對孟子的性善論提出一套精彩的詮釋,然而採取不同的取向:徐復觀從思想史發展的取向,追溯性善論在中國思想發展中的源流;牟宗三則採取哲學論證的方法,透過孟子與告子的論辯,顯示孟子透過理性論證的方式理所必然地確立性善論。由於取向不同,使得他們在細節的詮釋上小有出入。本文先從周初到《中庸》天命觀的演變、孟子對性善的貞定、孟子對性與命觀念的深化、孟子與告子的論辯這四點來重述徐復觀如何論述儒家性善論的思想發展;其次以杞柳之喻與湍水之喻、生之謂性之辯、仁義內在或外在、性善之確立這四點來重述牟宗三如何論證孟子性善論的確立;最後比較徐、牟對孟子性善論詮釋之同異。
英文摘要
The purpose of this article is to compare Xu Fuguan and Mou Zongsan's interpretations of Mencius'theory of “xing-shan”(性善). Xu and Mou are the two core figures of contemporary Neo-Confucianism. They both put forward a set of wonderful interpretations of Mencius'theory of xing-shan, but they adopt different approaches: Xu adopts the approach of the history of thoughts and investigates the historical development of theory of xing-shan in the Chinese humanity thoughts; Mou adopts philosophical argumentation and shows that Mencius rationally and necessarily establishes the theory of xing-shan through the debate between Mencius and Gaozi. Due to their different approaches, Xu and Mou present slightly different interpretations. This article begins with Xu's discussion of the Confucian thought of humanity goodness by tracing the evolution of the concept of destiny from the early Zhou Dynasty to the doctrine of “Zhong-Yong”(《中庸》). Specifically, I consider how Xu interprets Mencius' recognition of xing-shan, the deepening of Mencius'concept of humanity and concept of destiny, and the debate between Mencius and Gaozi. Second, I introduce how Mou demonstrates the establishment of Mencius'theory of xing-shan by using the metaphor of qiliu(杞柳)and turbulent water(湍水). Then, I consider how Mou argues for the Mencius'theory of xing-shan by using the debate over humanity is human nature, the debate over ren-nei-yi-wai(仁內義外), and the justification of Mencius' theory of xing-shan. Finally, I compare Xu's and Mou's interpretations by showing the similarities and differences in their interpretations of Mencius'theory of xing-shan.
起訖頁 71-101
關鍵詞 性善孟子徐復觀牟宗三xing-shan(性善 )MenciusXu FuguanMou Zongsan
刊名 子衿論衡  
期數 202006 (5期)
出版單位 國立中正大學中國文學系
該期刊-上一篇 梁啟超英雄觀探究——以《自由書》與《新民說》為敘述主軸
該期刊-下一篇 論楊澤波以「倫理心境」詮釋「孟子學」的合理性
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄