| 英文摘要 |
The purpose of this article is to compare Xu Fuguan and Mou Zongsan's interpretations of Mencius'theory of “xing-shan”(性善). Xu and Mou are the two core figures of contemporary Neo-Confucianism. They both put forward a set of wonderful interpretations of Mencius'theory of xing-shan, but they adopt different approaches: Xu adopts the approach of the history of thoughts and investigates the historical development of theory of xing-shan in the Chinese humanity thoughts; Mou adopts philosophical argumentation and shows that Mencius rationally and necessarily establishes the theory of xing-shan through the debate between Mencius and Gaozi. Due to their different approaches, Xu and Mou present slightly different interpretations. This article begins with Xu's discussion of the Confucian thought of humanity goodness by tracing the evolution of the concept of destiny from the early Zhou Dynasty to the doctrine of “Zhong-Yong”(《中庸》). Specifically, I consider how Xu interprets Mencius' recognition of xing-shan, the deepening of Mencius'concept of humanity and concept of destiny, and the debate between Mencius and Gaozi. Second, I introduce how Mou demonstrates the establishment of Mencius'theory of xing-shan by using the metaphor of qiliu(杞柳)and turbulent water(湍水). Then, I consider how Mou argues for the Mencius'theory of xing-shan by using the debate over humanity is human nature, the debate over ren-nei-yi-wai(仁內義外), and the justification of Mencius' theory of xing-shan. Finally, I compare Xu's and Mou's interpretations by showing the similarities and differences in their interpretations of Mencius'theory of xing-shan. |