「浙東唐詩之路」的再檢討：以竺岳兵所舉詩人浙東行迹為例

Self-criticism of the Post-roads in Eastern Zhejiang: By the Writings of the Tang Dynasty poets and poems in ZHU's publications

1991年由大陸浙江新昌地方人士竺岳兵正式提出「浙東唐詩之路」的專稱，並出版《唐詩之路唐代詩人行迹考》、《唐詩之路綜論》、《唐詩之路唐詩總集》。《唐詩之路唐代詩人行迹考》內容提要明言，這是一本考證唐代詩人遊止浙東「唐詩之路」的時間、路線、交通、事迹、詩篇等的書，但書中所舉詩人之例筆者認為有許多需再商榷之處。本文將分為三大部分：其一，重建唐代的交通，重新檢視竺氏提出浙東唐詩之路是否真能成立。其二，以詩人王昌齡、韋應物為例，此例乃目前學界多認為此二人未曾到過浙東，但竺氏肯定兩人到過浙東。其三，以孟浩然、白居易為例，此二人是目前學界公認到過浙東者，但其行走路線與範圍竺氏多有誤導之說。筆者在唐代交通的大背景下，以詩人個人案例為研究對象，輔以地域交通空間為經，以詩人創作的經歷為緯，重新做更全面的校正。

In 1991, ZHU formally put forward the special terms called “The Post-roads in Eastern Zhejiang”, and published three monographs of this special terms. The content summary of one monograph mentioned “It's a book that research the poets of the Tang Dynasty who once use the Post-roads in Eastern Zhejiang, contained their travel time, routes, transportation, their deeds and poems.” But some issues in the monographs are worth discussing again. This article will divide into three parts; first part will rebuild the mode of transportation in Tang Dynasty. Second part will take Wang Changling and Wei Ying-Wu for example, since academia generally believed these two poets had never been to Eastern Zhejiang, but ZHU takes the opposite point of view. Third part will take Meng Hao-Ran and Bai Juyi for example, academia generally believed these two poets had been to Eastern Zhejiang, but the routes and their travel range still have controversies. This article try to base on the wide background of Tang dynasty's transportation, supplemented by the cases study of the poets. Combined the district transportation with the create experiences of the poets, in order to re-correct this subject in more comprehensive way.