從被害人在刑事訴訟之地位與權利看被害人因素對法官量刑之影響──以最高法院110年度台上字第4955號刑事判決思覺失調症案為例

The Impact of Victim Factors on Judges’Sentencing from the Perspective of the Victim’s Status and Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Take the Case of Schizophrenia in the Criminal Judgment No. 4955 of the Supreme Court in 2011 as an Example

傳統刑事訴訟法，以「被告」為中心，實務運作與學術聚焦亦然。即便過去犯罪認定與近期量刑事實亦如是。本文以「犯罪被害人」為中心，從最高法院110年度台上字第4955號刑事判決思覺失調症案為例，透過該案訴訟過程，檢視關於犯罪被害人之地位與權利，乃至於對該案歷審刑事判決之案件影響，如調查證據請求權、獨立上訴權，以及司法精神鑑定、監護處分。並進而主張：犯罪被害人因素對法官量刑之影響，不只在於因素之分析，毋寧在於犯罪被害人之地位提升與權利賦予，將之「注入」刑事訴訟法，更對於犯罪被害人在刑事訴訟之理解與認知，以為日後司法政策（judicial policy）與健康政策（health policy）之政策規劃（policy planning）與政策評估（policy evaluation），臻於犯罪被害人之權益保障，冀至司法天平之公義實現。

Traditional criminal procedure law focuses on the“defendant”, and the same applies to practical operations and academic focus. This is true even with past criminal convictions and recent sentencing facts. This article focuses on“crime victims”and takes the Supreme Court’s 110th Taiwan Criminal Judgment No. 4955 Schizophrenia Case as an example. Through the litigation process of this case, it examines the status and rights of crime victims, and even the treatment of crime. The case impact of the criminal judgment of the case trial, such as the right to request investigation evidence, the right to independent appeal, as well as judicial psychiatric evaluation and guardianship sanctions. And further argued that: the impact of crime victim factors on judges’sentencing lies not only in the analysis of factors, but rather in the improvement of the status and granting of rights to crime victims, which are“infused”into the criminal procedure law, and also in the understanding and recognition of crime victims in criminal proceedings. We know that future policy planning and policy evaluation of judicial policies and health policies will achieve the protection of the rights and interests of crime victims, and hope that justice will be achieved in the judicial balance.