英文摘要 |
Participating Training for Promotion from Junior Rank to Senior Rank has become the exclusive pathway to attaining a senior rank civil service position. However, successfully completing this training does not guarantee automatic promotion. Critics argue that the training leads to the wastage of national resources and raise questions about its necessity. This study aims to assess the value of Training for Promotion from Junior Rank to Senior Rank and provide empirical evidence to facilitate a discussion on whether the continuation of this training is justified. The study centers on participants spanning the years 2014 to 2019, employing a comprehensive questionnaire survey. Furthermore, interviews are conducted with both individuals who have been rapidly promoted and their supervisors, with the objective of investigating the relationship between training and promotion. Overall, the participants have a positive view of the training, with satisfaction rates exceeding 93.3%. The courses ''Team Leadership and Subordinate Empowerment'' and ''Crisis Management(including Risk Management)'' are deemed the most beneficial to participants' work. Participants similarly believe that the competencies corresponding to these service. Besides the training courses, ''Expanding Interpersonal Networks'' is also recognized as an additional benefit of the training, ofering substantial assistance to their work. Besides, participants identify ''Approval by Superiors'' as a pivotal factor afecting their promotion. In-depth interview results likewise illustrate that when more than two individuals within the same organization, the critical factor distinguishing one's rapid promotion from another's lack thereof lies in receiving approval from superiors. The research results demonstrate that Training for Promotion from Junior Rank to Senior Rank is valuable. Not only assisting participants in their job roles and enhancing their competencies, but also ensures that individuals without nepotistic connections have the opportunity to promote. Simultaneously, it prevents those lacking professional competences from being promoted solely based on favoritism by superiors, which could result in inadequate capabilities negatively afecting governmental operations. |