英文摘要 |
ISDS mechanism are the primary means of settling investment disputes and are favored by capital exporting countries for their non-political and neutral nature. In recent years, due to the interest game between investors, host countries and home countries, the ISDS mechanism has also set off a wave of reform. In arbitration practice, China-related investors have encountered these problems, such as the conflict of investment treaty norms, the conflict of dual nationality of natural person investors, the vulnerability of Chinese state-owned enterprises to special targeting, and treaty shopping resulting in loss of investor status. The identification of investors is a breakthrough to alleviate conflicts of interests of all parties. In the process of studying the qualification standards for China-related investors, it is important to pay attention to the current situation of the qualification standards for China-related investors, namely, the lack of uniformity in the qualification standards for investors when nationality and permanent residence rights conflict, the gradual weakening of the effective or dominant nationality standard for natural person investors, the failure of the reasonable expectation doctrine to exert the standard effect in treaty shopping cases, and the risks posed by the state responsibility for the qualification of investors in China-related SOEs. The issue of dual nationality of China-related natural person investors should be handled in accordance with three principles. The“treaty shopping”of legal person investors can be restricted through the control right standard, and the principle of competitive neutrality can be adopted to guarantee the identification of SOEs investors. |