純粹行政犯的劃定及非罪化路徑分析

法定犯與行政犯是交錯關係而非包含與被包含關係，“不屬法定犯的行政犯”即“純粹行政犯”存在不同于自然犯與法定犯的獨特之處。在保護法益方面，該類犯罪專門或主要以秩序法益作為保護對象；在可罰違法性方面，該類犯罪因可罰違法性的量的缺失或質的不足而阻卻違法；在違法性認識可能性方面，適用於該類犯罪的是可罰刑法認識說。在立法層面，應當將純粹保護秩序法益的犯罪類型從刑法中剔除；在司法層面，合理運用保護法益、可罰違法性以及可罰刑法認識說，可以更好地克服經濟刑法中的新工具主義傾向。

The relationship between legal crime and administrative crime is one of overlap rather than inclusion. Administrative crime that does not belong to legal crime is a kind of pure administrative crime, which has unique features different from natural and legal crime. Regarding the protection of legal interests, this kind of crime specializes in or mainly takes the order of legal interests as the object of protection. Regarding culpable illegality, the law will intervene in this kind of crime due to the lack of quantity or insufficient quality of punishable illegality. Regarding the possibility of illegal cognition, the theory of culpable understanding of criminal law applies to this kind of crime. At the legislative level, the prohibited types of crimes that solely protect the legal interests of the state order should be removed from the criminal law. At the judicial level, the reasonable use of the theory of protection of legal interests, culpable illegality and culpable criminal cognition can effectively overcome the new instrumental trend in economic criminal law.