英文摘要 |
Through comprehensively and systematically examining the history of the formation of special economic zone regulations and analyzing the historical evolution of the scope of application of special economic zone regulations as well as the legal limitations of“application within the zone”, this article points out the essential differences in legal effectiveness between“application within the zone”and“application outside the zone”of special economic zone regulations, and analyzes the legislative value drawbacks of“one city, two laws”and“dual legislative power”. It is proposed to formulate the Basic Law on Special Economic Zone Regulations to replace the vague National People’s Congress authorization decision stipulated in the current Legislation Law as the legislative basis for special economic zone regulations. On this basis, it is advocated to strengthen the review and supervision of the constitutionality and legality of the regulations of special economic zones, to ensure that the regulations of special economic zones do not conflict with the national constitution, laws, and administrative regulations, and to maintain the authority of the principle of legal system unity respected by the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, which is centered on the Constitution. This article fully affirms the positive significance of retaining the legislative form of special economic zone regulations, and advocates that in the case where the local regulations formulated by the Municipal People’s Congress and its Standing Committee in the location of the special economic zone are completely consistent with the scope of application of the special economic zone regulations, the power to formulate local regulations shall be revoked and the substantive power to formulate special economic zone regulations be retained, in order to win more legislative space and development opportunities for the special economic zone. |