英文摘要 |
The sociology of knowledge emphasizes that in exploring the production of knowledge, one must deeply understand the external factors that affect the nature of knowledge. In the past, the development of Chinese studies in South Korea was influenced by external factors such as the“Cold War.”Before the establishment of diplomatic relations between South Korea and China, Chinese studies in South Korea were mainly dominated by the US-trained group and Taiwan-trained group. However, with the establishment of diplomatic relations between South Korea and China, the number of South Korean students pursuing doctoral degrees in China gradually increased, forming a new academic community known as the China-trained group. The China-trained group has an absolute majority in terms of quantity in South Korea’s Chinese studies, and currently dominates the field. However, there is still insufficient research on them. This article will focus on the China-trained group as the research object and examine their current situation and research methods in detail, in order to gain a deeper understanding of their position in South Korea’s Chinese studies. The majority of the China-trained group obtained their doctoral degrees from Peking University. This may have an impact on Korean research on China, including facilitating a deeper understanding of Chinese society and politics, but it may also limit research diversity. In addition, with the rise of China, the demand for China’s regional research in Korea has been continuously increasing. Consequently, the role of the China-trained group faction in Korea’s foreign policy has become increasingly significant. In terms of research methods, compared to other academic communities, the China-trained group who received education in China not only has a significant advantage in Chinese language, history, culture, economy, society, and politics but has also established extensive interpersonal relationships in China, thus obtaining empirical research results. The China-trained group, while having sufficient academic resources and interpersonal networks to contribute to Korean research on China, is also often perceived as Pro-China. However, within the China-trained group, there are diverse positions and perspectives on China’s issues. As such, they should not be considered as a homogeneous academic community with only one viewpoint or position. Currently, there is widespread anger towards China in Korean society, especially after the THAAD dispute and economic sanctions. Lastly, the China-trained group has the responsibility to approach China’s issues with academic expertise and research ethics, adopting on objective and empirical attitude, and considering ways to bridge the gap between national interests and public antipathy. |