英文摘要 |
ChatGPT can provide the knowledge structure and opinions required for research, but the researcher's practical operations and judgments remain indispensable. The responses from ChatGPT have their sources, but they lack explicit references to the original references, which is not acceptable in academic paper writing. Additionally, the authenticity of the data generated by ChatGPT cannot be confirmed, and it is currently not possible to directly analyze the data collected by researchers. While ChatGPT cannot replace the exploration of researchers in unknown domains, researchers can leverage the functionality of ChatGPT to find a common ground and propel their own development. It is evident that there are limitations and complementarity between ChatGPT and researchers. ChatGPT can be seen as a knowledgeable and patient guide, similar to an experienced supervising professor assisting graduate students in writing their theses. ChatGPT can provide content-rich suggestions, guiding users to further develop their knowledge and the content of their papers. |