英文摘要 |
In recent years, as some foreign M&A investment activities engage in critical industries or technologies in the host country, they have aroused concerns among countries that such investments will bring national security threats to the host country. ''National security'' thus has become an important issue in international investment law, and many countries start to implement a foreign direct investment screening mechanism for national security as a safety valve for them to protect the rights to regulate foreign direct investment. As ''National security'' is an uncertain legal concept, so far there are no worldwide consistent principles for foreign direct investment screening mechanism for national security, which raises foreign investors' doubts about the lack of transparency and predictability of the host country's screening mechanism for national security. For the disputes arising from the decision of the national security review, apart from pursuing local administrative or judicial remedies in the host country or resorting to Investor-State Dispute Settlement between investors and the host state, whether the disputes can be resolved through WTO dispute settlement mechanism is the main topic to be discussed in this paper. This paper would like to study on the foreign direct investment screening mechanism for national security in the United States, the European Union and Taiwan, and explore the feasibility of applying the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism to investment disputes arising from the decision of national security review. |