英文摘要 |
Introduction: The barbell trajectory in weightlifting is a focus of both coaches and weightlifters. Observation of the barbell trajectory during lifting can help weightlifters to adjust their movements and improve the success rate of lifts. However, previous studies have rarely compared differences in barbell trajectory between goodlift and nolift in the clean and jerk. We believe that the reason for the failure of the clean and jerk is worth investigating. Purpose: This study aimed to compare barbell travel distance and velocity in different stages of the clean and jerk. Methods: We used a Sony digital video camera at 60 frames per second to record the clean and jerk of 26 male weightlifters. The barbell trajectory was obtained from the videos. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences in trajectory between goodlift and nolift. Results: In the clean stage, the horizontal travel distance of the catch was significantly different between goodlift and nolift (p = .047), and the distance of goodlifts was less than that of nolifts. In the jerk stage, the vertical travel distance of goodlifts between the jerk dip (p < .01) and the jerk drive (p = .04) was significantly greater than that of nolifts, while no significant differences were observed in the other stages. Conclusion: The main reason for the failure of the clean and jerk among Taiwanese adult male athletes is the generation of excessive horizontal travel distance during the catch. Under this condition, athletes may waste power on modifying the barbell trajectory, which affects the subsequent performance of the jerk. In addition, insufficient jerk dip vertical distance reduces the vertical height during the jerk drive, thereby preventing the athlete from gaining sufficient height to complete the catch, which eventually leads to failure of the lift. |