月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
武大国际法评论 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論我國反外國制裁司法救濟機制之完善
並列篇名
On the Perfection of China's Judicial Remedy Mechanism for Anti-Foreign Sanctions
作者 肖凱徐佳雲
中文摘要
基於反制和救濟的功能定位,我國反外國制裁司法救濟機制應當遵循中央事權原則、威懾原則、比例原則。反外國制裁的司法救濟機制是涉外交事務的特別訴訟,有別于普通涉外民商事訴訟,應當建立特定的訴訟規則。在具體制度設計層面,應當完善集中管轄、審查層報、期間和送達、飛躍上訴等特殊審理程序,注意協調處理外國法院判決、國際商事仲裁裁決的承認與執行,並明確歧視性限制措施、制裁條款效力、損失賠償責任等核心實體性問題的認定。
英文摘要
Based on the dual functions of offsetting and remedying, China' s judicial procedure of sanctions-related cases should follow the principles of central authority, deterrence, and proportionality. The judicial remedy procedure of the Anti- Foreign Sanctions Case is a special litigation involving foreign affairs, which is different from ordinary foreign-related civil and commercial litigation, and specific procedural rules should be established. As to the detailed rules of adjudicating sanction-related cases, namely, centralized jurisdiction, internal reports and review, period and service, and leapfrog appeals should be customized to the current trial practices, especially in accordance with the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and international arbitral awards. Substantive issues, in the meanwhile, such as determining discriminatory restrictive measures, the effectiveness of sanctions clauses, and liability for losses, should also be clarified.
起訖頁 85-102
關鍵詞 反制裁司法救濟集中管轄歧視性限制措施制裁條款counter-sanctionjudicial remedycentralized jurisdictiondiscriminatory restrictive measuressanction clause
刊名 武大国际法评论  
期數 202306 (26:3期)
出版單位 武漢大學法學院
該期刊-上一篇 論經濟制裁對國際商事仲裁的影響
該期刊-下一篇 試論雙重國籍政策興起的深層原因
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄