中國式現代化的國際法意涵

An Interpretation of the Chinese Path to Modernization under International Law

黨的二十大報告明確了以中國式現代化全面推進中華民族偉大復興這一中心任務，強調走和平發展道路是中國式現代化的鮮明特徵，推動構建人類命運共同體是中國式現代化的本質要求。獨立自主、和平發展、多邊主義是探析中國式現代化之國際法意涵的三個關鍵詞。獨立自主是中國共產黨百年奮鬥得出的曆史結論，體現在國際法層面就是堅持國家主權原則，維護本國核心利益，推動國際關系民主化。維護和平、促進發展是國際法的根本價值取向，也是中國從和平共處五項原則到推動構建人類命運共同體的一貫立場；全球發展倡議和全球安全倡議將和平與發展問題有機結合，成為中國向世界貢獻的新的重要國際公共產品。踐行真正的多邊主義則意味著在相關制度和實踐中堅持開放包容而非封閉排他，反對單邊主義和偽多邊主義，並謹慎對待所謂“有效的多邊主義”。

It was determined on the 20th CPC National Congress that the central task of the Party will be to advance the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation on all fronts through the Chinese path to modernization. It was also noted that peaceful development is a defining feature of Chinese modernization, and that building a community with a shared future for mankind is one of the essential requirements of Chinese modernization. Independence, peaceful development and multilateralism are three key words for the interpretation of the Chinese path to modernization under international law. Independence is the historical conclusion that the Chinese Communist Party has drawn from its endeavors over the past century. From the perspective of international law, it means respecting the principle of state sovereignty, defending core national interests, and promoting greater democracy in international relations. Maintaining peace and advancing development is among the fundamental values of international law, as is the consistent position of China from the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence to the advocacy of building a community with a shared future for mankind. The Global Development Initiative and the Global Security Initiative, which meaningfully link peace and development together, are new important international public goods China has contributed to the world. Pursuing true multilateralism calls for openness and inclusiveness instead of closeness and exclusion in the relevant institutions and practices. All forms of unilateralism and“fake multilateralism”shall be firmly opposed, and the so-called“effective multilateralism”should be taken with a grain of salt.