深刻領會黨的二十大精神勇擔國際法學人的歷史使命

Comprehend Profoundly the Spirit of the 20th National Congress of the CPC and Undertake Boldly the Historical Mission of International Lawyers

黨的二十大報告第一次將“涉外法治”“國際法”寫入中國共產黨全國代表大會報告，要求統籌推進國內法治和涉外法治，堅定維護以國際法為基礎的國際秩序，彰顯了中國共產黨更加重視發揮國際法的作用。黨的二十大報告對教育、法治與安全所作的重大戰略部署要求加強國際法的運用與塑造。黨的二十大報告賦予中國國際法學人三大歷史使命：一是構建國際法人才自主培養體系，因此需要儘快恢復國際法本科教育，形成國際法本科—碩士—博士—博士後全鏈條人才培養體系。二是建構中國自主國際法知識體系，因此需要設立國際法一級學科。三是提高國際傳播與鬥爭能力，因此需要打通國際法理論生產與話語傳播，通過理論性話語生產、時事性話語鬥爭、規則性話語輸出、溝通性話語調適來提高國際傳播與鬥爭能力。

The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China is the first official report writes“foreign-related rule of law”and“international law”in the history of the National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which requires the overall promotion of domestic rule of law and foreign- related rule of law, and firmly safeguarding the international order based on international law. This shows that the Communist Party of China attaches greater importance to the role of international law. All the major strategic arrangements made in the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on education, rule of law and security requires strengthening the application and shaping of international law. The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has given Chinese international lawyers three historical missions: First, to build an autonomic cultivating system for international law talents, which need to restart undergraduate education in international law as soon as possible and to form a full-chain talent cultivating system for undergraduates, masters, doctorates and postdoctoral fellows in international law. The second is to build China’s independent knowledge system of international law, which requires establishing a first-level discipline of international law. The third is to improve the ability of international communication and competition, which needs to open up the theoretical innovation of international law and discourse dissemination, through theoretical discourse production, current affairs discourse competition, regular discourse output, and communicative discourse adjustment.