英文摘要 |
Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism is the core content of bilateral investment treaty (BIT) and an important institutional arrangement of global governance. It plays a key role in balancing the protection of investors’interests and safeguarding the host country’s regulatory rights. Although the terms of ISDS mechanism in currently enforced 106 Chinese BITs are different, they generally adopt three ways: friendly negotiation or consultation, domestic measures of remedies in the host country and international arbitration. In practice, neither most of the ISDS clauses in Chinese BITs have been updated nor have institutionalized mediation procedures been introduced in them. Some ISDS clauses are even relatively vague, and all the ISDS clauses in Chinese BITs lack an appeal mechanism. These are not conducive to China’s promotion of the negotiation of ISDS mechanism in RCEP and CAI, nor to the optimization of the bilateral or multilateral ISDS mechanisms of China. In order to comprehensively balance the relationship between“bringing in”and“going out”strategies, China should learn from the innovative arrangements made for ISDS mechanism in the practices of EU, Brazil and other countries, and introduce three mutually independent and interconnected mechanisms, namely, dispute prevention provisions, institutionalized mediation procedure before a domestic institution of the host state prior to adjudication and appellate court system, into the ISDS mechanism in Chinese BITs, so as to accelerate the optimizing and improving process of ISDS mechanism. |