英文摘要 |
The resolution of real estate registration disputes is an issue that has been challenging for a long time. The general understanding that real estate registration is an administrative action and administrative disputes should go through administrative litigation has led to a large number of real estate registration disputes entering the administrative litigation channel. However, administrative litigation is not able to substantially solve the relevant disputes, and the new Administrative Litigation Law affirms that the “administrative and civil trial together” is also almost futile. The nature of the registration action and the choice of proceeding need to be reconsidered. Under the real estate registration system established by the Property Law, the action of registration has lost its function of administrative control and aims at public disclosure. Although registration is an administrative action in the broad sense, it is not an administrative adjudication, and the traditional dispute resolution route of administrative decision is no longer suitable. In practice, disputes over the revocation of real estate registration are in essence disputes over property rights, which can be resolved through civil litigation to confirm rights and then apply to the registry for correction of registration. The lawsuit of revocation of real estate registration is a wrong path, which should be clearly excluded. There is still room for registration administrative litigation, but it is only applicable to requesting the registration authority to perform its registration duties and to compensate for the damages caused by illegal registration. The effective resolution of administrative disputes requires clarification of the nature of the dispute and reasonable application of the type of litigation, and administrative litigation is not a “panacea” for resolving administrative registration disputes. |