技術避風港的實踐及法理反思

技術進步引發平臺責任制度的變革，進而催生出技術避風港這一特殊規制手段。當前，我國圍繞主體責任搭建平臺責任體系，儘管此舉給平臺施加了強有力的外部規制壓力，但網絡平臺在違法內容和行為治理方面依舊暴露出諸多未解難題，表現在網絡盜版、個人信息洩露、網絡暴力、數據安全等方方面面。技術避風港作為“私權力”興起背景下的一類法律規制模式，在當前我國平臺責任制度中被嚴重低估。面對當前我國平臺責任制度過於粗放、技術規制激勵不足的現狀，我國監管機構應當利用技術發展為平臺治理帶來的契機，圍繞技術避風港來構建平臺責任制度。這一轉變將使得平臺治理變得更為有效、更能適應技術更新迭代，進而改善我國網絡平臺的治理現狀，順應平臺經濟健康有序發展的需求。

Technological progress has led to changes in platform liability, which in turn has given rise to a special means of regulation: the technology safe harbor. At present, China’s platform liability system is built around the agent liability system. Although this regulatory strategy has exerted strong external regulatory pressure on platforms, the regulation on illegal content and behavior is still exposed to many unsolved problems, presented in scenarios such as online piracy, personal information leakage, online violence, data security, etc. As a novel legal regulatory mechanism against the background of the rise of “private power”, technology safe harbor is a legal tool that is seriously underestimated in the current platform liability system in China. The reality of China’s platform liability system is too harsh and rough, and the incentive of technical regulation is insufficient. Thus, China’s regulators should take advantage of the opportunity brought by the development of technology for platform governance, and build the platform liability system around the technology safe harbor. This change will render platform governance more cost-effective and more adaptable to the iteration of technology, thereby improving the status quo of platform governance in China and meeting the needs of the healthy and orderly development of the platform economy.