互操作的意義及法律構造

互操作有利於競爭與創新，也符合企業利益。市場競爭環境下，不同企業對於互操作會有不同的選擇，是正常現象。為此，需要不同法律制度的體系性構造，既保證小平台互操作權利的實現，又在維護公平競爭底線的過程中避免對大平臺採取一刀切做法，以調動不同平臺持續創新的積極性。我國目前的制度構造缺乏整體設計，既不利於全面調動不同主體的積極性，也不利於充分利用法律武器維護我國的國家利益。需要科學理解《數據二十條》，按照《數字中國建設整體佈局規劃》，及時按程序調整不適應數字化發展的法律制度。

Interoperability is good for competition and innovation, and also consistent with enterprises’ interests. However, it is normal that different enterprises might have different choices of interoperability strategy under respective circumstances of market competition. For this reason, in order to incentivize continuing innovation for different platforms, systematic construction of legal institutions is needed, assuring rights to interoperate for small platforms on the one hand, and avoiding one-size-fits-all methods while leveling fair playing ground for big platforms on the other hand. Current institutional construction in China lacks comprehensive design, and it is not favorable to mobilize enthusiasm of different platforms as well as safeguard national interest via efficient use of legal weapon. It is necessary to interpret the Twenty Articles of Data scientifically, and to amend relevant legal provisions inconsistent with digital development in a timely manner and procedures, according to the Comprehensive Framework Planning of Digital China Construction.