因果流程偏離的結果歸責分析路徑

因果流程偏離不是事實認識錯誤，不適用認識錯誤的處理規則，其本質是行為實施後具體因果流程相對于行為人的預見發生的偏離，屬 故意犯結果歸責的問題。錯誤理論對該問題的錯誤界定導致了分析方法的錯誤，引發了內在邏輯矛盾與標準的不明確性;客觀歸責理論主觀視角的欠缺導致了歸責評價的不完整性，造成內在邏輯矛盾和標準正當性危機。結果歸責的本質是對故意既遂犯不法完整性的檢驗，內容是對主客觀事實在規範範圍內的同一性評價，方法是檢驗主客觀事實的重合部分是否為禁止風險所包含。因果流程偏離的結果歸責分析路徑是，比較行為人認識的風險相關基礎事實與客觀實際發生的事實，對兩者重合部分加以描述，以裁判者視角，立足行為時點，結合自然因果法則與規範保護目的，判斷主客觀事實的重合部分是否足以評價為創設並實現法所不容許的風險。

Deviation of causal process is not a kind of cognitive mistake of facts, but the deviation between the specific causal process and the perpetrator's prediction after the commencement of the conduct. In essence, it is a matter about result imputation of the intentional accomplished offender rather than the recognition of conduct intention. The wrong definition of this matter in the theory of mistakes leads to the mistakes in analysis method and the ambiguity of the criterions. The theory of objective imputation is incomplete because of the lack of subjective criterion, which results in internal logical contradiction and legitimacy crisis. The essence of result imputation is the completeness of illegality in intentional accomplished offender, the method is to verify whether the overlapped part of the subjective and objective facts is included in the risks prohibited by law. To analyze the deviation of causal process, we shall first compare the risk-related basic facts recognized by the perpetrator with the objective facts, and describe the overlapped parts of them. Then, by standing at the time point of conduct, we shall consider law of causation and goal of normalized protection jurisdiction, judging from the view of the adjudicator whether the overlapped parts of subjective and objective facts can be judged as the creation and realization of risks prohibited by law.