英文摘要 |
In the major misunderstanding system, the main manifestation of fault is negligence. According to the impact of the fault of the expresser and recipient on revocation and damage compensation in mistake of expression of will, the laws of different countries and regions can be divided into four major types: recipient fault element type, fault exclusion revocation type, non-fault element type and fault compensation element type. The right of revocation and legal consequences of compensation for major misunderstandings in China's legislation should be interpreted differently based on different fault situations of both parties. First, the requirement for the right of revocation should not consist of subjectively no-fault of the party who made the mistake. The proviso to the second paragraph of Article 19 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation of the General Provisions should not include the subjective negligence of the expresser. Second, the interpretation of Article 157 of the PRC Civil Code should be narrowed to exclude the fault element of the expresser's liability for compensation if a major misunderstanding. Third, if neither party has fault for the mistake, nor is attributable, the rules of risk allocation shall apply, and the declarant shall bear the liability for compensation; but if the mistake is attributable to the counterparty, then the declarant is exempt from compensation. Fourth, the fact that the counterparty does not have reasonable reliance should be an exclusion for damages compensation, but when both parties are at fault, it does not exempt the party who made the mistake from the liability for compensation. |