月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中外法学 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論司法解釋的性質和效力位階
作者 苗炎
中文摘要
在法律上,司法解釋被定性為效力低於法律的規範性文件,但其與法律以下各類型立法之間的效力位階未得到明確,這既無法避免其與法律以下各類型立法之間的衝突,也沒有為它們之間發生衝突時如何適用提供指引。最高人民法院將司法解釋定性為作為補充性裁判依據的規範性法律文件;而在司法裁判中,當事人和法院關於司法解釋性質和效力位階的認知呈現明顯的多元化。學者們在理論上對於司法解釋性質與效力位階的認識立場迥異,迄今並未得出邏輯融貫、符合實際的結論。司法解釋在實質意義上就是制定法。綜合考量其特殊性以及若干歷史、現實等方面因素,司法解釋的效力位階應分情況而論:刑事司法解釋的效力僅低於法律。其他司法解釋與行政法規具有同等效力,二者規定不一致時,由全國人大常委會裁決。經濟特區法規作出的變通規定優先於其他司法解釋適用。經濟特區法規與其他司法解釋規定不一致且不能確定經濟特區法規的規定是否構成對法律的變通規定時,由全國人大常委會裁決。
英文摘要
Judicial interpretation is considered as normative documents with lower validity than the statutes. However, the validity hierarchy between judicial interpretation and the various types of rules under statutes has not been clarified, which can neither avoid the conflict between judicial interpretation and the various types of rules under statutes, nor provide guidance on how to apply in case of the conflict between them. The Supreme People's Court defines judicial interpretation as normative legal documents as supplementary judgment bases. In judicial adjudication, the positions of the parties and the courts about the nature and validity hierarchy of judicial interpretation are obviously diverse. In theory scholars have different viewpoints on the nature and validity hierarchy of judicial interpretation and have not reached a logically coherent and realistic conclusion so far. Judicial interpretation is statute in essence. Considering its particularity and several other historical and realistic factors, the validity hierarchy of judicial interpretation should be divided into different situations: the validity of criminal judicial interpretation is only lower than the national law. Other judicial interpretations and administrative regulations have the same validity. H the two provisions are inconsistent, the Standing Committee of the National People' s Congress shall make a decision. The adaptive provisions made by regulations of special economic zones shall prevail over other judicial interpretations. If there is any discrepancy between regulations of special economic zones and provisions of other judicial interpretations and it is uncertain whether the provisions of the regulations of special economic zones are implementing provisions to the statutes, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress shall make a decision.
起訖頁 425-444
關鍵詞 司法解釋效力位階裁判依據制定法Judicial InterpretationValidity HierarchyJudgment BasisStatute
刊名 中外法学  
期數 202303 (206期)
出版單位 北京大學法學院
該期刊-上一篇 物權法爭議問題之挑戰──常鵬翱教授《物權法的“希爾伯特問題”》之啟發
該期刊-下一篇 重大誤解中的過錯要素──意思自治與信賴保護之平衡
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄