英文摘要 |
In the preface of “Dongfang-Shuo HuaZan”, Xiahou-Zhan made a vivid and innovative textual rewriting of “Hanshu”. At the same time, there is a strong intertextual relationship between the preface and verse of “Dongfang-Shuo HuaZan”. The first three paragraphs of the verse mainly echo the second and fourth paragraphs of the preface; the last three paragraphs inherit the sixth paragraph of the preface and further deduce, rewriting and lyricizing the text. The interrelatedness of the texts at the above two levels also presents the “YinGua”檃括technique in the stylistic transformation. From the perspective of stylistics, Xiahou-Zhan's “Dongfang-Shuo HuaZan” has three major innovations: Firstly, Xiahou-zhan broke through the function of HuaZan in the late Han Dynasty to “reflect political gains and losses”. The focus of the narrative had obviously been separated from the portrait itself, and has injected rich lyricism of personal literature. Secondly, HuaZan's rhyme grew substantially and changed rhymes five times. This is related to the gradual confusion between the styles of “Song” and “Zan” from the end of the Han Dynasty to the Wei to the Jin Dynasties. Thirdly, “HuaZan” is the first Zan 贊 prose with an obvious “preface and praise intertextuality”. The author believes that this was due to the mutual involvement of the Zan and the Bei 碑, which may be influenced by the “intertextuality of Bei and Ming 碑銘” in the writing method of inscriptions represented by Cai Yong. The pioneering stylistic variation of HuaZan had a profound impact on the writing of the six dynasties. With the help of Xiahou-Zhan's “Di Yi”, it is found that when Xiahou-Zhan wrote “Dongfang-Shuo HuaZan”, he projected the image of himself, full of talents and uprightness, on Dongfang Shuo who was “ reclusive in the court”, to carry out spiritual self-healing and tempering. At the same time, it is speculated that the creation time of “Dongfang Shuo Painting Praise” is likely to be similar to that of “Di Yi” |