英文摘要 |
Taiwan was enmeshed in the Second World War as a Japanese colony. However, no monument of the war has been erected in Taiwan, and Taiwan-centered discourses about the war remain under construction since the end of the war. Therefore, when advancing the proposition to “regenerate the historic site” of the Imperial Japanese Navy’s Sixth Fuel Factory, Hsinchu Branch, we should carefully tackle the questions regarding whose history and site it actually is within the historical context of the factory. Only by doing so can we attach substantial, root-taking significance to the Ministry of Culture’s Regeneration of Historic Sites Project. Nonuments, the Sixth Fuel Factory interactive theater, was staged on the basis of these questions. The discourses of this paper center on the theoretical propositions, praxis and rethinking of Nonuments. Using this theater as the text of research and treating the IoTtalk voting system that engaged the viewers in the multi-media historical writing as the point of departure, this paper seeks to investigate if the viewers’ collective participation in designing the monument of the Second World War simultaneously galvanized them into alternative historical writing. To deal with this issue, this paper adopts a seven-pronged strategy, including “semantic lacuna”, “interrogative monument”, “history, memory and forgetting”, “plot and question design”, “real-time data computation cloud”, “thinking as the other”, and “intersubjective dialogue”, through which the development and connotation of alternative historical writing can be analytically discussed. Furthermore, this article intended to discuss how Nonuments uses the theater as the medium, the making of monuments as the content of the work, and the historical scene as the performing space. This transitional space that mixes the virtual with the real allows the audience to participate in the performance. In addition, Nonuments brings the participants to raise interrogative inquiries and reflect upon Taiwan's World War II history and the politics of cultural governance behind it. |