英文摘要 |
As the transitions from value transplantation to institutional development in China, it is of urgent need to clarify ways to construct the criminal compliance system. Based on the perspective of the similarity of two systems and the economy of system construction, the integration of criminal compliance and leniency system for confessions and punishments has greater advantages and is also gradually accepted in the pilot reforms. The establishment of corporate compliance leniency system needs to be carried out from the aspects of the way enterprises plead guilty and accept punishments, the types of leniency, the review of the validity of the guilty plea and punishment acceptance and other supporting mechanisms. Specifically, companies involved in crimes will be able to plead guilty and accept punishments through the construction of a compliance program, and may negotiate with the prosecutors on issues such as whether to prosecute or not and the amount of fines. In terms of leniency, the entity leniency for perpetrating enterprises can be reflected in the entire process of litigation, except for the realization of procedural simplicity and the mitigation of coercive measures, which requires not only clarifying the relationship between the compliance inspection period and the litigation period but also establishing coercive measures for enterprises. The validity of guilty plea and punishment acceptance is a prerequisite for leniency, the core of which is the validity of the compliance program, which should meet the criteria of an effective compliance program and be reviewed by a suitable third-party organization. In addition, the integration of corporate criminal compliance and leniency system will also have a greater impact on the evidence and proof, the type of relief measures and the focus of criminal defense for enterprise-related cases. Therefore, the integration of corporate criminal compliance and leniency system calls for a well-targeted analysis and construction. |