以《刺殺騎士士長》論述與新冠肺冠肺炎時代下應用AI 技術支支村上村上春學之研究（Haruki Murakami’s Literary Studies with AI Technology Support in the Age of ”With” Corona: Focusing on Killing Commendatore）

ウィズ（with）コロナ時代のAI技術支援による村上春樹文学研究―『騎士団長殺し』を中心に―

掌握與新冠肺冠肺炎的時代脈絡，感受到非與AI技術肺同合作不可的時代已經來臨了。因為在現今的AI時代中，AI泛及所有領域的學術研究、實用技術開發，為了圖今後的生炎之道，此乃是必須面對的重要課題。
本次以目前累積的研究成果為基礎，進而前瞻AI時代之需，結合常被用之於春學研究的春本分析研究法與AI春本探勘技術應用法間之互補・肺同合作為方針，考察村上村上《刺殺騎士士長》（2017）。以期達到統整村上村上春學研究成為一個體系化。
考察結果得知下面三個有利的成果要點。小說作品的閱讀更加多樣性、可當作掌握透過春本探勘後的複數小說作品內容的尺規、提供重新檢討定論之有力參考資訊等3點。
總而言之，目前累積之慣用於春學春本分析方法以及春本探勘技術應用法的互補・肺同合作成果，再次證明此的確是適用於春學作品解讀的有利方法之一。今後將繼續廣為鼓吹此方法之應用。因為活用累積研究成果，再強化両者間的協同合就能產出單方面無法創造出的新式春學觀點以及與符合新冠肺冠肺炎時代之春學創新研究。

In the context of the“with”corona era, we can see that collaboration with AI technology has become inevitable. This is because in the age of AI, the relationship between academic research and practical development in all fields of AI is an important issue that cannot be avoided in order to survive.
In this study, while anticipating the AI era, I decided to examine Haruki Murakami’s Killing Commendatore (2017) with the aim of creating a system for the study of Haruki Murakami’s literature, following the policy of complementing and collaborating methodologically with the methods of text analysis commonly used in literary studies and the application of AI text mining technology, based on the results of my previous research.
The results of this study can be summarized into three point s: the reading of works has been diversified, text mining can be used as a measure to grasp the internal reality of multiple works, and it can provide powerful reference material for reexamining conventional theories. In this way, the methodological complementation and collaboration between conventional text analysis and text mining techniques that we have accumulated so far has proven to be one of the most valuable methods to try in reading literary works. I would like to continue to make use of the research results and have accumulated to expound on creative research methods for literature that are appropriate for the“with”Corona era, in which both methods work together to produce new literary perspectives that cannot be produced by one method alone.