談《文化資產保存法》的重要性

On the Importance of ' Cultural Heritage Preservation Act '

台灣長期存在重視文化遺產申報，忽略保護。把文物保護當作是裝點門面的花瓶或是地方的部門利益，甚至是以一種投機的態度對待保護。這一方面是保護主體的缺位，而自上而下的指令性保護，未能充分調動民眾的保護，常常遭到地方和社區的消極抵抗；另一方面在經濟掛帥的影響下，為迎合市場需求的古蹟再利用，往往和過度開發連繫在一起。並面臨建設性破壞的威脅。因此，在保護實踐中．往往涉及到各個行為主體的保護意願和各方利益的衝突問題。 本文以《文化資產保存法》與城市發展間的衝突與調和，試圖探討城市發展的過程中如何與文化資產保存共存，並進一步分析兩者間的衝突與不同價值的調和，並找尋相對應的方式，以不同方式達到文化資產保存的效果，筆者以案例分析，探討未來文化資產保存納入其他非文化行政機關、法制規範及都市發展的可能。

Taiwan has long attached importance to the declaration of cultural heritage and neglected protection. The protection of cultural relics is regarded as a decorative vase or a local departmental interest, and even protection is treated with a speculative attitude. On the one hand, it is the absence of the main body of protection, and the top-down mandatory protection fails to fully mobilize the protection of the people, and is often met with passive resistance from the local and community; on the other hand, under the influence of the economy, in order to meet The market demand for the reuse of historic sites is often associated with over-development. And face the threat of constructive destruction. Therefore, in conservation practice. It often involves the protection will of various actors and the conflict of interests of all parties. Based on the conflict and reconciliation between the 'Cultural Heritage Preservation Act' and urban development, this article attempts to explore how the process of urban development and the preservation of cultural assets coexist, and further analyzes the conflict between the two and the reconciliation of different values, and finds corresponding solutions. In order to achieve the effect of cultural asset preservation in different ways, the author discusses the possibility of incorporating cultural asset preservation into other noncultural administrative agencies, legal norms and urban development in the future through case analysis.