商事定暫時狀態處分與股東事前救濟

Commercial Preliminary Injunction and Shareholder’s Ex-ante Remedy

本文探討商事定暫時狀態處分與股東事前救濟間之關係，指出前者在依循既有民事訴訟法架構同時，對後者所造成之影響，並進一步反思股東事前救濟之可能程序定位。本文認為定暫時狀態處分之本案化特性，在股東事前救濟的脈絡中被進一步凸顯，因此制度上如仍規劃讓股東依循定暫時狀態處分程序獲取救濟，則應放寬釋明之即時調查限制以充實股東證據調查手段、促使商業法院就聲請人實體權利存否之蓋然性進行判斷而宣示法律見解，並在確保聲請人之強制執行權益下，公布裁定全文。此外，商業法院亦可規劃提出得以加速審理流程並裁判之規畫，引導當事人循本案訴訟程序獲取事前救濟。

This article explores the relationship between injunction and ex-ante remedy. The injunction under the Commercial Case Adjudication Act follows the framework set under the Civil Procedure Act, with the emphasis on certain features similar to the adjudication procedure. Given the similarity to the adjudication procedure is further amplified when the injunction is used by the shareholder to pursue ex-ante remedy in a corporate dispute, this article argues that the restriction of timely investigation imposed on the preliminary proof should be eased in this context. The commercial court should also express its opinion on substantive issues and publish all the injunctions rendered for the doctrine of shareholder ex-ante remedy to be established and developed. The commercial court may also consider proposing an expedite process to guide the claimant to use the adjudication procedure to pursue ex-ante remedy.