英文摘要 |
China's basic pension insurance has adopted the combination mode with social pooling and individual accounts, aiming to give full play to the mutual aid function of social pooling and the incentive function of individual accounts, but the implementation of this mode has led to serious confusion between public and private funding sources in the past 20 years. At the institutional level, the individual account is the mandatory savings of current wages of employees, which has the nature of private right. But in practice, it has been mixed with the social insurance pooling fund to pay the pension of retired employees, which essentially shows that the private right of the individual account has been absorbed by the mutual aid function of social pooling. The origin of this problem is that the current model is contrary to the internal legal principle of basic pension insurance, and does not build the ''statutory obligation'' under the intergenerational agreement, also the relationship between employees and social security agencies does not conform to the insurance legal relationship. The reform of individual account should adhere to the direction of mutual aid, and follow the structure of combination mode, but separate the individual account and individual premium, thus deposit the individual premium into the social insurance pooling fund. The individual account serves as the abstract record of individual payment experience, which represents the contribution of individual to social community and appears in the form of salary point. Salary point is the annual salary of employees divided by the national average salary of the year. Individual account is the accumulation of salary points over the years, which is used as the main basis for calculating pension. |