英文摘要 |
When the property is infringed, in addition to claiming compensation in accordance with Article 196 of the Civil Law, the application of Articles 213 to 215 of the Civil Law is not excluded. Therefore, the victim may request the obligor of compensation to restore the injured party to the status quo before the injury or for the diminution of the value of the thing. In practice, it is believed that when the repair materials are replaced with new ones, they should be depreciated according to the table of durability years of fixed assets. As a result, the victim must bear part of the cost of repairing materials, which is really unfair. This article believes that when the object is infringed, even if the repair material is replaced with a new product, it will only restore the damaged object to its original state, and will not increase the overall value of the object. Therefore, there will be no situation where the victim will be more profitable due to the damages of the tort. In the case of compensation for the damages of the tort, the victim should not bear the cost of material depreciation. As for when the parties agree to exchange a new product for an old one (for example, a vehicle that has been used for 2 years is compensated for a vehicle that has been used for 5 years) as compensation for damages, this article believes that this is a substitute performance. Whether a liquidation mechanism is implemented between the two parties should be entrusted the parties agree on their own. |