歷史性建築修復或再利用工程審查作業之探討

Exploring the Reviewing Procedures for Historical Buildings’Restoration or Re-use Engineering

「如期如質」的完成歷史性建築修復或再利用工程，是歷史性建築所有人及主管機關共同的目標，依文化資產保存法之規定，古蹟修復或再利用計畫及歷史性建築設計書圖均須送文化資產主管機關審查，透過「審查」的把關，以確保歷史性建築修復或再利用工程的品質。目前文化資產主管機關係以透過委員審查的方式來進行審查，但因歷史性建築修復或再利用工程甚為專業且複雜，本應有合理的工作期程，但卻因「年度預算」執行率的關係，造成只求「如期」完成之現況，成立專款專用的「歷史性建築保存基金」，當可顧及更重要的品質要求，而強化主管機關專業人才之編制，使有足夠專業人員先自行審查，應能有效縮短審查流程，並嚴格把關，確保審查的品質。

To finish a historical building’s restoration or re-use“on schedule and according to the demanded quality”is the common goal of the historic building’s owner and the responsible governing authority. In accordance with the provisions of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act any restoration or re-use plan and design of a historic building must be sent to the responsible authority for review to ensure that the restoration or re-use work’s quality is guaranteed. Because of the complexity and special nature of restoration work on historic buildings, it is best that the task be done in a reasonable period. Unfortunately, owing to the demand for achieving official annual budget targets, the demand for quality is usually sacrificed to expediency. It is useful to establish an earmarked ''Preservation Fund for Historical Buildings'' and to strengthen the professional capability of the competent authority. This would ensure that there were enough qualified professionals to do the first-level reviews, thus shortening the reviewing process yet still keeping good quality control.