跨越主觀：網路同儕互評應用於大學藝術設計課堂之實踐研究

Beyond Subjectivity: The Practice Research of Web-Based Peer Assessment for College Art and Design Courses

實施網路同儕互評之重要性，在於可協助學生建構知識，解決問題迷思，促進批判性思考以及培養其終身學習技能。然而，針對此議題應用於大學藝術設計課堂的實證研究仍不多見，無法清楚了解網路同儕互評對藝術設計學習者的態度、線上評分與學習成效之影響。據此，本研究藉由網路同儕互評的實施，探究其對學習者的相關知覺與學習表現之轉變。本研究以修習「數位影像創作」課程之37名大一學生為研究對象，利用易課平台（ee-class）的同儕互評功能，讓學習者透過評分規準對作品進行互評活動並分析其學習歷程資料，包括問卷調查、回饋單、訪談以及教學省思札誌等資料。研究結果發現：1.學習者對網路同儕互評的接受度高，認為實施同儕互評有助激發創意與培養鑑賞力；2.學習者肯定網路同儕互評的公平性，認為結合評量規準可降低評分不公之情形；3.學習者認同實施網路同儕互評所產生的多元學習效益，並持正向評價。最後，本研究提出相關建議，作為實施網路同儕互評及未來研究之參考。

Web-based peer assessment can promote critical thinking and help students construct their knowledge, solve problems, and develop lifelong learning skills. However, research on its application in college art and design courses is scarce, and the influence of web-based peer assessment on students' attitudes, viewpoints, and learning outcomes remains unclear. This study investigated changes in students' perceptions and learning effectiveness through the implementation of peer assessment on 37 first-year students from a digital image creation course. Ee-class online learning platforms were used to allow students to conduct peer assessment of their work based on scoring rubrics, and to analyze data on their learning process through questionnaires, feedback forms, interviews, and reflective journals. The results indicate that peer assessment demonstrates 1) high acceptability, by stimulating creative thinking and art appreciation; 2) fairness, by reducing grading injustice and promoting objective assessment based on web-based peer assessment and grading criteria; and 3) benefits of a diverse learning environment. This study serves as a reference for web-based peer assessment implementation and subsequent research.